Add post as:

By submitting the form, you acknowledged that you are or over 18 years old and you will follow local policies and laws.

CONFESS ANONYMOUSLY

Cancel Culture is Stupid.

Posted Apr 7, 2021 14:00 by anonymous
230 views | 47 comments

Loading...
  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 14:07 by anonymous

    I agree! Boycotting the MLB for standing up for voting rights is stupid as hell. So is boycotting the NFL, NBA and Nike for affirming that Black Lives Matter.

    That IS what you meant, right?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 14:10 by Birdhead

    Republicans do it all the time but when the left does it, suddenly it's a problem.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 14:18 by anonymous

    “I agree! Boycotting the MLB for standing up for voting rights is stupid as hell. So is boycotting the NFL, NBA and Nike for affirming that Black Lives Matter.

    That IS what you meant, right?”

    Lmao.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 14:25 by anonymous

    “I agree! Boycotting the MLB for standing up for voting rights is stupid as hell. So is boycotting the NFL, NBA and Nike for affirming that Black Lives Matter.

    That IS what you meant, right?”

    How does baseball stand up for.voting rights, by going from a state with a voter ID law, to another state with a voter ID law.?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 14:28 by anonymous

    “I agree! Boycotting the MLB for standing up for voting rights is stupid as hell. So is boycotting the NFL, NBA and Nike for affirming that Black Lives Matter.

    That IS what you meant, right?”

    Go put on your face diaper and be a good little commie

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:12 by anonymous

    “How does baseball stand up for.voting rights, by going from a state with a voter ID law, to another state with a voter ID law.?”

    It was stupid of baseball to do this. Based on their own criteria of standing up for voting rights, they go to a state with similar voting laws.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:18 by anonymous

    Days before MLB decided to pull out of Atlanta for the all star game they resigned and expanded a deal with a chinese telecom company. So what china does to its own people is not a concern of MLB but apparently a state strengthening its ballot integrity is a problem with MLB. Weird.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:20 by anonymous

    “Days before MLB decided to pull out of Atlanta for the all star game they resigned and expanded a deal with a chinese telecom company. So what china does to its own people is not a concern of MLB but apparently a state strengthening its ballot integrity is a problem with MLB. Weird.”

    But the liberals said that voter law was Jim Crow coming back.

    Remember that the facts don't matter. What matters is the liberal view of any issue. On this issue, they decided that this voter law is Jim Crow, and they got Joe Biden to parrot back that statement. So that's where we are at.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:29 by anonymous

    “But the liberals said that voter law was Jim Crow coming back.

    Remember that the facts don't matter. What matters is the liberal view of any issue. On this issue, they decided that this voter law is Jim Crow, and they got Joe Biden to parrot back that statement. So that's where we are at. ”

    Remember that the facts don't matter? What?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:32 by anonymous

    “Remember that the facts don't matter? What?”

    Facts don't matter to the liberals. Facts we can cite about how this new law expands voter access in some ways, will simply be ignored by the liberals. Since facts conflict with their opinion that this law is Jim Crow, they ignore the facts.

    There is no way that Joe Biden, or anyone, if they read that law, could say it's a return of Jim Crow. They are parroting back a liberal conclusion that this law is Jim Crow, without any facts to back up such an opinion.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:39 by anonymous

    “Facts don't matter to the liberals. Facts we can cite about how this new law expands voter access in some ways, will simply be ignored by the liberals. Since facts conflict with their opinion that this law is Jim Crow, they ignore the facts.

    There is no way that Joe Biden, or anyone, if they read that law, could say it's a return of Jim Crow. They are parroting back a liberal conclusion that this law is Jim Crow, without any facts to back up such an opinion.”

    I think they're focused on the areas that possibly suppress votes. Having other aspects that expands voter access does not negate that.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:47 by anonymous

    “I think they're focused on the areas that possibly suppress votes. Having other aspects that expands voter access does not negate that.”

    But nothing in the bill supresses votes.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:49 by anonymous

    “I think they're focused on the areas that possibly suppress votes. Having other aspects that expands voter access does not negate that.”

    Being asked for an ID, is hardly comparable to "Jim Crow" laws which kept blacks from voting.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 15:53 by anonymous

    “Being asked for an ID, is hardly comparable to "Jim Crow" laws which kept blacks from voting. ”

    I think the new laws are more restrictive than that but I have to admit that I have not read through all of them.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 16:48 by anonymous

    AND YET IT WAS REPUBLICANS THAT TRIED TO CANCEL AN ELECTION LOSS BY ATTEMPTING A COUP.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 16:50 by anonymous

    “AND YET IT WAS REPUBLICANS THAT TRIED TO CANCEL AN ELECTION LOSS BY ATTEMPTING A COUP.”

    Thr guy at the Capitol with the Viking headdress was trying to overthrow the government?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 16:53 by anonymous

    “Thr guy at the Capitol with the Viking headdress was trying to overthrow the government?

    Yeah, that's why all of them were there, dumbfuck.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 16:59 by anonymous

    “But nothing in the bill supresses votes. ”

    Not true. The bill restricts the number of ballot dropboxes, reduces the amount of time voters can ask for absentee ballots, and restricts voting times on early voting days, all of which have the effect of making it harder to vote.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:05 by anonymous

    “Not true. The bill restricts the number of ballot dropboxes, reduces the amount of time voters can ask for absentee ballots, and restricts voting times on early voting days, all of which have the effect of making it harder to vote.”

    Republicans are black and white thinkers. Either people are being actively stopped from voting or there's no voter suppression of any kind.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:05 by anonymous

    My dad used to say take a subject to both extremes to validate its worth.
    The thought that every person, corporation, country etc. Worth Is only measured by the worse action they have ever, done, participated in or even supported by lack of NOT supporting it goes against our society giving additional "chances".
    It seems insane... but. "In an insane world would not the same person appear insane?"

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:11 by anonymous

    “Not true. The bill restricts the number of ballot dropboxes, reduces the amount of time voters can ask for absentee ballots, and restricts voting times on early voting days, all of which have the effect of making it harder to vote.”

    Is it the most strict voting process of all the states? I've heard that New York has a policy that is more complex and has components that could be considered more extreme.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:14 by anonymous

    “Not true. The bill restricts the number of ballot dropboxes, reduces the amount of time voters can ask for absentee ballots, and restricts voting times on early voting days, all of which have the effect of making it harder to vote.”

    But it also increases the number of early voting days.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:17 by anonymous

    “Republicans are black and white thinkers. Either people are being actively stopped from voting or there's no voter suppression of any kind.”

    LOL. What you said is true of Democrats. They have taken the position, that any changes to voting laws is a return to the Jim.Crow laws of the past. That's black and white thinking on the part of Democrats.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:23 by anonymous

    “LOL. What you said is true of Democrats. They have taken the position, that any changes to voting laws is a return to the Jim.Crow laws of the past. That's black and white thinking on the part of Democrats. ”

    No, it's really not. They're overreacting not engaging in black and white thinking.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:24 by anonymous

    “But it also increases the number of early voting days. ”

    So What? That doesn't negate the ways they're suppressing votes.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:25 by anonymous

    “So What? That doesn't negate the ways they're suppressing votes.”

    Depends on the criteria you use, to evaluate the situation.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:28 by anonymous

    “Depends on the criteria you use, to evaluate the situation. ”

    And what criteria should people be using?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:34 by anonymous

    “And what criteria should people be using?”

    Key criteria would be issues such as:

    that nobody is denied the right to vote.
    Everyone is treated equally, such as with the ID requirement.
    Everyone has the same number of early days in which to vote

    If anyone is suppressing votes, that is already against the law. Anyone doing that should be prosecuted under the law. But the law treats everyone equally.

    But if you use different criteria to evaluate the situation, you would come to different con lesions, based on such criteria.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:46 by anonymous

    “Key criteria would be issues such as:

    that nobody is denied the right to vote.
    Everyone is treated equally, such as with the ID requirement.
    Everyone has the same number of early days in which to vote

    If anyone is suppressing votes, that is already against the law. Anyone doing that should be prosecuted under the law. But the law treats everyone equally.

    But if you use different criteria to evaluate the situation, you would come to different con lesions, based on such criteria.”

    You do realize that when people talk about voter suppression, they are not actually stopping people from voting, right? They are referring to things that make it harder for people to vote. This is the black and white thinking I was referring to earlier.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:47 by anonymous

    “Not true. The bill restricts the number of ballot dropboxes, reduces the amount of time voters can ask for absentee ballots, and restricts voting times on early voting days, all of which have the effect of making it harder to vote.”

    That's funny because not that long ago people didn't have any problems going and voting in person. And don't you see any problems with early and mail in voting? What if the candidate died before election day? What if the voter died before election day? What if someone other than the named voter filled out their ballot? If it is to difficult for someone to obtain an id and go vote in person they don't deserve to vote, because that tells me they are to stupid to figure out who best represents their voice.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:48 by anonymous

    “That's funny because not that long ago people didn't have any problems going and voting in person. And don't you see any problems with early and mail in voting? What if the candidate died before election day? What if the voter died before election day? What if someone other than the named voter filled out their ballot? If it is to difficult for someone to obtain an id and go vote in person they don't deserve to vote, because that tells me they are to stupid to figure out who best represents their voice. ”

    There is a pandemic.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:54 by anonymous

    “You do realize that when people talk about voter suppression, they are not actually stopping people from voting, right? They are referring to things that make it harder for people to vote. This is the black and white thinking I was referring to earlier.”

    Define voter suppression and also discuss how making changes to voting is a return to the JimCrow laws of the past. And please address that everyone is treated equally under the law and how that ties in with voter suppression. Please explain what Joe Biden meant by saying this law.is Jim Crow on steroids and if you agree with that assessment.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:57 by anonymous

    “Define voter suppression and also discuss how making changes to voting is a return to the JimCrow laws of the past. And please address that everyone is treated equally under the law and how that ties in with voter suppression. Please explain what Joe Biden meant by saying this law.is Jim Crow on steroids and if you agree with that assessment.”

    I think calling it Jim crow law is an exaggeration so there is no need for me to explain. Different people have different circumstances in their lives. Things that might not make voting more difficult for you may make voting difficult for other people.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 17:59 by anonymous

    “Define voter suppression and also discuss how making changes to voting is a return to the JimCrow laws of the past. And please address that everyone is treated equally under the law and how that ties in with voter suppression. Please explain what Joe Biden meant by saying this law.is Jim Crow on steroids and if you agree with that assessment.”

    The definition of voter suppression is in the name. Look up the words.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:04 by anonymous

    “I think calling it Jim crow law is an exaggeration so there is no need for me to explain. Different people have different circumstances in their lives. Things that might not make voting more difficult for you may make voting difficult for other people.”

    I agree its absurd to call this Jim Crow, glad you agree. Unfortunately that is the Democratic party position. Yes people have different circumstances in life. But we have to have laws and regulations. A big complaint seems.to be the voter ID requirement. If peoole don't have an ID, then let's streamline the process to get an ID, rather than saying someone might not have one, and because someone might not have an ID that somehow means we can't require an ID.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:06 by anonymous

    “I agree its absurd to call this Jim Crow, glad you agree. Unfortunately that is the Democratic party position. Yes people have different circumstances in life. But we have to have laws and regulations. A big complaint seems.to be the voter ID requirement. If peoole don't have an ID, then let's streamline the process to get an ID, rather than saying someone might not have one, and because someone might not have an ID that somehow means we can't require an ID. ”

    You say Democrat party position like every Democrat is required to agree. It's just making you sound stupid.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:09 by anonymous

    “The definition of voter suppression is in the name. Look up the words.”

    Who is being prevented from voting?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:11 by anonymous

    “You say Democrat party position like every Democrat is required to agree. It's just making you sound stupid.”

    Have any Democrats come out and said they oppose the President's position?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:11 by anonymous

    “Who is being prevented from voting?”

    I feel like this conversation is going in circles. Again, these laws make voting HARDER.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:12 by anonymous

    “Have any Democrats come out and said they oppose the President's position?”

    Why would they need to do that?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:15 by anonymous

    “Why would they need to do that?”

    To convince people that it isn't the official Democratic position. If they don't oppose the president, then by default people will assume Democrats are all on board with this.

    You know that. During the Trump years people talked of Trump amd the Republicans as one and the same, politically.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:16 by anonymous

    “To convince people that it isn't the official Democratic position. If they don't oppose the president, then by default people will assume Democrats are all on board with this.

    You know that. During the Trump years people talked of Trump amd the Republicans as one and the same, politically.”

    You cannot assume another person's position just because they haven't spoken on the matter.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:19 by anonymous

    “I feel like this conversation is going in circles. Again, these laws make voting HARDER.”

    Even if it makes it harder, the Georgia law is still more lenient than many other states. And nobody is being prevented from voting.

    So it sounds like you think the criteria should be, if a law makes it harder to vote in some ways, its automatically a bad law. What exactly is your objection?

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:20 by anonymous

    “You cannot assume another person's position just because they haven't spoken on the matter.”

    People do that all the time in politics.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:24 by anonymous

    “Even if it makes it harder, the Georgia law is still more lenient than many other states. And nobody is being prevented from voting.

    So it sounds like you think the criteria should be, if a law makes it harder to vote in some ways, its automatically a bad law. What exactly is your objection?”

    I originally replied to your absurd assertion that facts don't matter to democrats. I do not care enough about the voting laws in question to explain the same thing to you over and over again. Jesus.

  • Commented Apr 7, 2021 18:25 by anonymous

    “People do that all the time in politics.”

    I don't fucking care. I don't and you shouldn't either.

  • Commented Apr 8, 2021 15:05 by anonymous

    Another Russian intelligence troll or Republican operative planted this confession and a lot of the comments. Beware of this sort of fear-mongering by FoxNews and others. Does it really affect you or is it trying to raise nastiness in the US to give an advantage to our adversaries?

ADD NEW COMMENT

Add comment as:

Reply To Comment:

Your Message (please type your comment here)

By submitting the form, you acknowledged that you are or over 18 years old and you will follow local policies and laws.


CONFESS ANONYMOUSLY
CONNECT WITH US

You can also see RawConfessions at:


NEED HELP?

If you are in need of help please contact people who care and please remember suicide is never the answer.

1-800-SUICIDE (1-800-784-2433) - National Hope Network Toll-Free, 24/7 hotline for emergency suicide information

1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) - National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, 24/7 free and confidential support for people in distress

International Suicide Helplines

1-866-488-7386 - The Trevor HelpLine - Specializing in LGBTQ youth suicide prevention & help

Child Helpline International - International Child Helpline Network

RAINN - International Sexual Assault Helplines

Mental Health Europe - Helplines for Young People

1-800-388-3888 - Covenant House


Suffering from Pornography Addiction? [SFW]

Is My Fetish Porn Induced?

Rebooting Basics: Start Here

NoFap Forum

NoFap Subreddit

Fight the New Drug - YouTube Channel

Truth About Porn - Research Studies